Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland

Two elderly women who applied five times for permission to demonstrate in China’s Olympic protest parks against the demolition of their homes have been ordered to serve a year of re-education through labour, according to a human rights group.
It is the toughest penalty to be reported against any of those who followed up an announcement by the Government that it would allow protests in three Beijing parks during the Games. So far, police say that they have received 77 applications. None has been approved.
Wu Dianyuan, 79, and Wang Xiuying, 77, have been petitioning the Government since they were forcibly evicted from their homes in Beijing in 2001 as part of a series of huge renovation projects across the city.
They applied five times between August 15 and August 18 to the Beijing city Public Security Bureau for permission to demonstrate in the newly designated protest parks.
The former neighbours wanted to protest against their evictions seven years ago. Their application was neither granted nor denied but on August 5 they were held for ten hours for questioning by police, the son of one of the women told Human Rights in China.
On August 17 they each received a document from the city authorities ordering them to serve one year of re-education through labour — an administrative punishment that does not require any judicial process — from July 30 this year to July 29, 2009, for “disturbing public order”. The two would be allowed to serve their term outside a camp but the notice restricts their movements and states that if other regulations are violated they could be moved to a camp.
Li Xuehui, the son of Mrs Wu, told the Associated Press: “Wang Xiuying is almost blind and crippled. What sort of re-education through labour can she serve? But they can also be taken away at any time.” The women remained at home but were under observation by a neighbourhood watch group, he said.
Another Beijing resident, Zhang Wei, who had been trying for two years to gain compensation after the demolition of her home to make way for a development south of Tiananmen Square, was another who saw the protest parks as an opportunity to express her views.
After she applied for a protest permit she was ordered in early August to serve 30 days in custody for “disturbing public order”. She will not be free until after the Olympics.
Sharon Hom, of Human Rights in China, said: “Punishing Wu and Wang after they applied for protest permits and actively petitioned the Government demonstrates that the official statements touting the new Olympics ‘protest zones’ . . . were no more than a show.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dominic Robinson, London, UK
you just speak out what I thought! "Free China" and "Free Tibet" . As a Chinese I have been to Tibet and have many Tibet friends, I know in fact we are facing the same question.
Rachel, Guangzhou, China
to Colin, Carmarthen,
i love your comment, yes, that is a grass root life here.
you must have been in china for a while, you know here a lot.
moon, guizhou, China
Colin, perhaps you daughter ought to be sent to a re-education or labour camp for the stunt she pulled. Her stunt in China may be deemed acceptable in the UK, but not in China. Whatever one's views are regarding Tibet, democracy etc, one must learn to respect another's country's rule of law.
dominik, london, uk
Dear Times.
Please could this human-rights story go back on the front page for further airing?
The subject of elderly ladies being sent to work camps is an important grass roots issue that looks inside real life for ordinary Chinese. I feel this needs to be brought to wider attention
Colin, Carmarthen, United Kingdom
IT, Beijing, China:
"One forgets the fact that their homes and lands were given to them by the communist government 50 years ago. and they never own the land. It has always been the state's property.".......how DARE those women protest!! Evict and re-educate got it!!
Sola, Wellington, NZ
Alistair, Alicante, Spain........if the IOC see fit to give it to Germany when under Hitler (then the worst human rights offender) then it's no surprise that the old fogies would give it to China who now hold the worst human rights title.
Lord knows what they're thinking, if they do at all <sigh>
Sola, Wellington, NZ
To it in Beijing
But it was only the state's property because the CCP appropriated all property from individuals after 1949. And this is not an article about the rights or wrongs of that - it's about why two old women want to protest peacefully and are going to be re-educated for their efforts.
Jane Hilton, Shanghai, China
To Jeremy, Frome
You said: 'my daughter was wrongfully arrested while protesting'
I bet your daughter has not been sent off to a re-education by labour camp. There is a huge difference between what happens here and in China. For you to say that our UK Police 'ensure trouble happens,' is untrue
Colin, Carmarthen, United Kingdom
it, Beijing, China.
You said: 'their homes and land were given to them by the CCP and they never own the land.'
Are you offering this as an excuse for their mistreatment or are you saying that landless people have no civil or human rights? Because that's what it sounds like from here.
Colin, Carmarthen, United Kingdom
China is the 4th largest economy but in terms of freedom, it's probably ranked 200th. It has a long way to go but things are improving. We didn't have freedom to travel or move about but now we can. It takes time but we have to be patient. I'm confident things will change for the better soon.
Yang, Shanghai, China
I always thought that the 'Free Tibet' banners should have been flying next to 'Free China' banners. We seem to have forgotten or brushed past the fact that China is still run by a harsh communist regime with no respect for individual rights.
Dominic Robinson, London, UK
Human rights must be upheld - this is indisputable. But I cannot count on the media to report fairly and transparently, especially with regard to news from Asia.
SW, Bath, UK
One forgets the fact that their homes and lands were given to them by the communist government 50 years ago. and they never own the land. It has always been the state's property.
it, beijing, china
The world leaders who attended the opening ceremony, so giving approval to China's staging of the Olympics, should be ashamed. I imagine other Chinese with legitimate protests did not dare apply for these permits but Wu Dianyuan and Wang Xiuying probably thought they had little left to lose.
Diana, Derby,
Isn't communism lovely (not)? The government knows best surely (not)! Did anyone honestly believe anything the lying, manipulative, controlling Chinese government said about allowing protests? We are not even allowed to protest in this country without getting approval "due to the terrorism threat"!!
Harry, London, UK
And my 17 year old daughter was wrongfully arrested when protesting at Bush's visit last month. 1200 coppers to watch 2400 protestors
What's the difference between here and China? Not a lot, I think - when did we last see the police permit a peaceful demo in London? THEY ensure trouble happens
Jeremy Poynton, Frome, England
One of the elderly woman is almost blind and crippled. She is currently confined to her home and being watched for any sign of suspicious behaviour by her neighbours. She can now be reported on and taken away at any time to the labour camp. Such is the grass roots of every day life inside China.
Colin, Carmarthen, United Kingdom
This just proves that the IOC are naive and possibly corrupt in granting the games to the Chinese dictatorship. I'm sure there will be a lot of state sponsored traffic to this "blog" telling us how wonderful China is and the west is corrupt and misinformed. Judge for yourself.
Ian M Jones, Reading, UK
Join Amnesty International! The ONLY organisation fighting for humans to be treated as humans!
Chris, London,
We can only imagine the true human cost to the Chinese people of these games.
Wouldn't it be great if our opening ceremony was a march of people who had had their lives saved by the money for the opening being spent on hospitals.
Trevor, Cambridge, UK
What did anyone expect ? It's a disgrace that the Olympics were ever held in China, but the international community is so self-obsessed with jingoistic personal glory that it has been prepared to turn a blind eye to the appalling conduct of this brutal regime. Shame on all of you.
Alastair, Alicante, Spain