David Rose
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
Elderly people are suffering from abuse, neglect and malnutrition in hospitals and care homes, according to a report by peers and MPs.
The report, published today by the Joint Committee on Human Rights, calls for changes in the law to safeguard the care of older people, and for a “complete change of culture” in health and care services.
More than a fifth of care homes have been found to be failing basic standards for privacy and dignity, with the most vulnerable residents struggling to eat without proper help, being subjected to verbal and physical abuse or being left to lie in their urine or excrement.
Two thirds of NHS hospital beds are occupied by the over65s, while the number of older people in the population is growing such that, by 2050, there will be twice as many Britons aged over 80 as there are today. Although the committee was told that some patients received excellent care, it said “there are serious concerns about poor treatment, neglect, abuse, discrimination and ill-considered discharge”.
It also found evidence of “historic and embedded ageism” within healthcare services, causing a failure to “respect and protect the human rights of older people”.
The report includes the example of an 80-year-old woman who was sexually assaulted by a fellow resident in a care home in 2004: “It was recorded in a log book but no action taken . . . It was only reported to the resident’s daughter in July 2005. She reported the matter to the police.”
Another woman, who had difficulty feeding herself, “appeared to be slowly starving to death” because visitors who could have helped her were discouraged from staying during meal times. In other cases, bed sores were not treated because staff said “it was not their job”. The charity Age Concern estimates that 500,000 older people are subject to abuse at any one time, mostly in healthcare settings.
The committee’s report adds: “In our view, elder abuse is a serious and severe human rights abuse which is perpetrated on vulnerable older people who often depend on their abusers to provide them with care. Not only is it a betrayal of trust, it would also, in certain circumstances, amount to a criminal offence.”
It also cites problems with malnutrition, dehydration and the abuse of medication as a means of controlling older patients. The Alzheimer’s Society said that up to 40 per cent of patients with dementia were being prescribed powerful sedative drugs, despite the risks to their health.
Other examples of neglect included a lack of hygiene in some hospitals that encouraged potentially deadly infections such as Clostridium difficile.
Some 21 per cent of care homes failed to reach minimum standards for privacy and dignity last year, the Commission for Social Care Inspection told the committee. Problems included the use of mixed-sex wards and, a lack of confidentiality in discussing medical problems. Despite this, the committee was “alarmed” that the Government’s planned new healthcare inspectorate would not be given powers to investigate individual complaints from patients or their families.
It criticised the Department of Health and Ministry of Justice for failing to “provide proper leadership” and guidance on the Act to providers of health and residential care.
Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. The committee calls for care standards regulations to be amended so that all care homes are brought under the terms of the Act.
Ivan Lewis, the Minister for Care Services, said: “We recognise this anomaly and will continue to work closely with the Ministry of Justice and all other interested parties to ensure that people cared for by the NHS and councils have the protection of the Act.”
Kate Jopling, head of public affairs at Help the Aged, said: “The shocking examples highlighted by this report provide all the evidence this Government needs to justify urgent action.”
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
C£100K+
Chronophage
Isle of Man
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
with reference to joanne, ilkeston, uk's comments. Britain has gone mad. Why should this lady have to fight to have her grandmother looked after in her own home? I think Social Services is one of the biggest problems the UK has. They simply hijack people and their children and nobody can fight back.
Jean, VAncouver, Canada
My Grandma has just been admitted to hospital, and it looks like she has been abused in a nursing home, my hands are tied at the moment, during the police investigations, i feel i want to tell the world, but have been told not to yet, I am browsing the net this evening looking for some help!!
k, wiltshire, uk
I have been a nurse tutor and advisor to care homes for over 10 years. The fundamental problem is appropriate funding; good quality care requires the funds for adequate staffing levels who have the knowledge and skills and the motivation (pay incentives) to deliver it. This needs addressing URGENTLY
Jackie Brown RGN/BSc, Southend on Sea, United Kingdom
i thing that is it bad to abuse elderly people because it is not write at all we are meant to love them and not bully them.
They are old and delicute and it is not write at all if it was me i would do something about it and stop all the abuseive.
Dannie , hull, england
the goverment dont do any thing i m fighting social services at the moment to have my grandmar live with me as i have witnessed abuse and reported it with no effect as it still continues on a regular basis ,myself and my father just get laughed at socal severcies fob me off and lie to me on a regular basis and im at my wits end dont no who to contact as they all works together and i feel i cannot trust any one but they think they can get away with this as my granmar cannot respond as she as elzimas and wouldnt say boo to a goose any way she is a wonderful lady .the system stinks ps i was a nurse my self and left because i reported a collegue abusing a client and the nursing home made my life hell and forced me to leave.but now its happening to my own granmar and i cannot do anything i feel so usless please help me someone.
joanne, ilkeston, uk
I own and run a Residential Home for elderly people with varying levels of dementia. The only news we hear about Residential Care homes is bad news but may I reassure those people reading your paper who are looking for a Residential Home for their elderly loved ones, not all homes are bad. There are hundreds of very good homely homes full of very caring staff whose only motive for working in the caring industry is to provide a safe and secure place for elderly people to live.
Although 21 per cent of care homes failed to reach minimum standard, the government through Social Services still fund these homes yet the good homes that have reached and excelled the standards set down struggle to pay staff a decent wage. It seems the Government has fantastic ideas on how elderly people should be cared for but will only give a proportion of funding expecting relatives to âTop Upâ fees from residentâs savings. This creates a two-tier system â those who have money and those who havenât, and the people who have been frugal all their lives are being penalised and subsidising the people who havenât. The government are well aware of the situation but are relying on relatives to foot the bill.
Ms Bridget Luckham, Tavistock, Devon
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and may be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
Unfortunately the press today has turned the committee's findings into a crude attack on care homes. The Mailâs article fails even to mention that the report covers both hospitals and care homes! The broadsheets and TV perform only a little better. The fundamental issue highlighted in the report is the failure to treat the elderly in the same way as other vulnerable groups within our institutions, but some of the press have quickly gone to the complaints section of the report and pulled out examples relating only to care homes instead of covering the whole report properly. This is slack reporting which distorts the message and as such is a disservice to the vulnerable elderly that should benefit from a meaningful debate of the findings.
S Robinson, Northampton,
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
This is not a new problem and has been brought to the publics attention many times over but has been ignored by the very people who could change the law to protect people in homes and hospitals. My Mother was in care and hospital at various times between December 1973 and June 1974 until her death in June 1974. The home was understaffed always and while generally most nurses were kind to her, I always had to be there to try and feed her in the evening ( I worked during the day) because for the rest of the day, being unable to feed herself , she had very little to eat and I often found drinks and food left there untouched. In fact when I had seen to Mum I would assist another elderley lady in the ward for the same reason, her relatives could not be there to help.
Mum had parkinson's and this made it difficult to dress her towards the end, one day in the care home I found her freezing cold by an open window with only the mimum of clothing on because there was not enough staff on to help
Patricia Lodge, Farnborough, Hamshire,England
There should be a law that forces Nursing/Care homes to employ a Doctor to inspect them and instruct staff about the needs of the "patients". He should report anomalies to the authorities.
Ray, Maidstone, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act."
This is a joke right? You are joking?
The government is passing the 'problem' to profiteering companies who seem to have no legal responsibility to care for the elderly? This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
Who exactly is responsible for this fiasco?
Do remember that you create the system in which YOU and yours will grow old. Better put this right now, and give the elderly and vulnerable the best possible care. For everyone's sake. And not tomorrow, next week or next year but RIGHT NOW.
T. Bishop, London, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act."
This is a joke right? You are joking?
The government is passing the 'problem' to profiteering companies who seem to have no legal responsibility to care for the elderly? This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
Who exactly is responsible for this fiasco?
Do remember that you create the system in which YOU and yours will grow old. Better put this right now, and give the elderly and vulnerable the best possible care. For everyone's sake. And not tomorrow, next week or next year but RIGHT NOW.
T. Bishop, London, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act."
This is a joke right? You are joking?
The government is passing the 'problem' to profiteering companies who seem to have no legal responsibility to care for the elderly? This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
Who exactly is responsible for this fiasco?
Do remember that you create the system in which YOU and yours will grow old. Better put this right now, and give the elderly and vulnerable the best possible care. For everyone's sake. And not tomorrow, next week or next year but RIGHT NOW.
T. Bishop, London, UK
Every one of these homes should have an NHS nurse in it on a regular basis and that nurse should move between homes on a weekly basis covering ten homes so that he/she doesn't "go native". That NHS nurse should not only help out during their week there but they should train staff and spend at least one day a week writing up a report on the home. Any homes that fail to meet minimum standards should be closed with no right of appeal. The NHS nurses should also be given a few random homes to work in that they will never visit again for long periods. In this way we can put the NHS in charge and we can also ensure that by smearing the visits and reports acrosss many establishments and many NHS nurses that bad care homes will have nowhere to hide. If we weren't paying for care that would be one thing but £500 plus per week paid by individuals or councils should buy far more than we are getting.
John, Dundee, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and may be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
Most of the elderly will be horrified at the thought of the ludicrous Human Rights Act being applied to them. I hope they stick to their guns and demand the repeal of this Politically Correct nonsense.
I hate Political Correctness with every fibre of my being and I know most of the older generation feel the same way.
Great Britain should just pull out of the Human Rights Act .
Emil Minty , London,
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
"Local authorities are increasingly referring elderly patients to homes run by the private and voluntary sector, which are exempt from the Human Rights Act. "
Is this a joke? Really, are they joking?
This says that Local authorities are handing over the care of the elderly to profiteers and companies who are EXEMPT from the legal responsibility to care for the elderly...." This is tantamount to criminal negligence.
The elderly and vulnerable should have the best possible care available, and not tomorrow but now!
What exactly are we paying the Government and Minister for Care Services for? To hand over responsbility to companies who cannot be monitored or held to account? It better be put right and soon! Don't forget, you create the system in which YOU and yours will one day grow old and may be dependent!!! Better put it right now.
T. Bishop, London, UK
Lets be honest. Not enough people care. However, everyone has old age coming to them. The abuse and neglect will continue from generation to generation.
We live in a culture of greed and selfishness, in general.
Bring on euthanasia.
douglas, Crawley, Uk
How on earth can private care homes be exempt from the human rights act ? who's idea was that ? Seems as though it's almost deliberately set up to allow these kind of things to happen , the Government has a lot to answer for ...
Benzo, Nr Chelmsford,